SEE:Ten things people want to know about Python

  • In order to separate blocks of code (like for loops, if blocks and function definitions) the compiler / interpreter needs something to tell it when a block ends. Curly braces and end statements are perfectly valid ways of providing this information for the compiler. For a human to be able to read the code indentation is a much better way of providing the visual cues about block structure. As indentation also contains all the information for the compiler, to use both would be redundant. As indentation is better for humans, it makes sense to use that for the compiler too. It has the advantage that Python programs tend to be uniformly and consistently indented, removing one hurdle to understanding other people's code. Python does not mandate how you indent (two spaces or four, tabs or spaces - but not both), just that you do it consistently. Those that get used to the Python way of doing things tend to start seeing curly braces as unnecessary line noise that clutters code. On the other hand, 'the whitespace thing' is possibly the single biggest reason why some developers refuse to even try Python.

[Folklore says that the ABCers in the '80s experimentally determined that significant whitespace has measurable advantages. 'Anyone have documentation for this?]

Additional observation::

Why separate sections by indentation instead of by brackets or 'end' (last edited 2009-04-05 23:45:26 by 99-51-74-201)

Unable to edit the page? See the FrontPage for instructions.