|
Size: 3095
Comment:
|
Size: 4026
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| * [[Date(2004-07-25T02:19:08Z)]] - updated to 1.2.3, made custom layout into a theme * [[Date(2003-04-29T20:24:59Z)]] - updated to rev 1.173 * [[Date(2003-03-30T15:56:33Z)]] - updated to CVS and refreshed the help pages * [[Date(2003-03-13T00:13:44Z)]] - activated ''edit locks'' (warnings only for now); time handling changed to use UTC, '''so you have to adapt your user (timezone) settings''' * [[Date(2003-03-07T17:35:38)]] - update from cvs should have fixed RecentChanges problems for anon users; installing PyXML should have fixed any RSS problems |
|
| Line 16: | Line 21: |
| * Decide explicitly a convention for page deletion for unpriviliged users. | |
| Line 38: | Line 42: |
| Line 39: | Line 44: |
| How useful is the MailTo macro? It seems to add spam protection only in the editable version of the page, not in the plain page which is most likely to be seen be address harvesters. -- -- DanielDittmar [[DateTime(2003-02-22T00:39:32)]] |
I think this Wiki would best serve as continuing from where standard Python documentation left off: showing examples of use, adding information about good packages not existing in the standard distribution, and talking about higher-level stuff like 'tips for parallel processing'. Examples are very important for newcomers, and hey, many people like to learn new things first from examples, and dive into reference when details become important (including me). As for discussing Python in general, I think c.l.p is invaluable and needs no replacement - so I guess I'm along the same lines as DanielDittmar and JürgenHermann. -- EdvardMajakari [[DateTime(2005-09-15T15:14:13Z)]] |
News / Changes
Date(2004-07-25T02:19:08Z) - updated to 1.2.3, made custom layout into a theme
Date(2003-04-29T20:24:59Z) - updated to rev 1.173
Date(2003-03-30T15:56:33Z) - updated to CVS and refreshed the help pages
Date(2003-03-13T00:13:44Z) - activated edit locks (warnings only for now); time handling changed to use UTC, so you have to adapt your user (timezone) settings
Date(2003-03-07T17:35:38) - update from cvs should have fixed RecentChanges problems for anon users; installing PyXML should have fixed any RSS problems
Date(2003-02-13T00:46:26) - update to rev 1.168, which especially means backups on editor submits for people having a homepage, and spam protection via the MailTo macro
Date(2003-02-07T20:44:54) - update to CVS head
Date(2002-12-29T15:29:08) - Split up the too large frontpage into multiple head pages.
- updated to CVS current (rev 1.166)
- Friday the 13th lived up to the promise... several bugs fixed
linksThatStartWithLowerCase are not links anymore, thus boost.python/InternalDataStructures stopped to work; but ["boost.python/InternalDataStructures"] works, and on the ["boost.python"] page, /InternalDataStructures works too (i.e. use the short form of subpage links).
Date(2002-11-21T06:16:54) - updated to CVS current (rev 1.163)
Date(2002-11-06T22:40:50) - You can now refer to PEPs like so: PEP:0123 -> 0123
Date(2002-08-02T00:19:27) - Outgoing mail works now
Things that need doing, unless they're done
- We need a mission statement on the front page. What it's for, who can/should participate.
- Need to create a discussion / ask for help section(s).
Discussion
Unfortunately, the ISBN links point to amazon.com, not amazon.de -- DanielDittmar
Well, this is hardly surprising in an English wiki. You can use full http links, though. -- JürgenHermann DateTime(2002-07-26T02:01:40)
I wasn't surprised, but I was thinking of adding ISBN.de http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/ to intermap.txt (now that I found how ISBN works). -- DanielDittmar DateTime(2002-07-26T21:14:18)
Some ideas about the aims of this wiki:
What I would like to use this Wiki for is for comparisons between Python packages. Most areas seem to have multiple solutions. Is it very unwiki to impose some structure like I did in WebProgramming and trying to keep it up? GuiProgramming and IntegratingPythonWithOtherLanguages are also candidates for this kind of style. -- DanielDittmar DateTime(2002-07-15T02:21:48)
Imposing (widely accepted) structure is not unwiki, actually it is a goal of refactoring. Otherwise, you end up with a spaghetti wiki, i.e. chaos. -- jh
Discussions about Python should be held on comp.lang.python and the SIGs, but it is OK to summarize those discussions in the wiki. -- DanielDittmar DateTime(2002-07-15T02:21:48)
The entire point of a wiki is to capture discussion in such a way that it will be remembered IMO - dhl 20020716
That still means that you can capture from news, or from the wiki itself. Both ways are valid, but always refactoring/summarizing is A Good Thing. -- JürgenHermann DateTime(2002-07-17T21:24:51)
I think this Wiki would best serve as continuing from where standard Python documentation left off: showing examples of use, adding information about good packages not existing in the standard distribution, and talking about higher-level stuff like 'tips for parallel processing'. Examples are very important for newcomers, and hey, many people like to learn new things first from examples, and dive into reference when details become important (including me). As for discussing Python in general, I think c.l.p is invaluable and needs no replacement - so I guess I'm along the same lines as DanielDittmar and JürgenHermann. -- EdvardMajakari DateTime(2005-09-15T15:14:13Z)