|
Size: 1500
Comment:
|
Size: 2181
Comment: link to notes for Maintainer MVP meeting
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| #acl All:read | #acl PackagingWGGroup:read,write,revert, All:read #format rst |
| Line 3: | Line 4: |
| NOTE: This is still a draft and not yet finalized. = Agenda = |
Agenda ====== |
| Line 13: | Line 13: |
| = Resources = | Resources ========== |
| Line 15: | Line 16: |
| * Discussion, TBD: Will we want primarily realtime communication (Slack?) or primarily asynchronous (Discourse? Mailing lists?). Will we want this to be private or public to outsiders? |
* Discussion: Slack and mailing list. The archives will be set to private since there will be voting. |
| Line 22: | Line 21: |
| = Current Projects = | Current Projects ================ |
| Line 25: | Line 25: |
| the legacy code base that powers PyPI. | the legacy code base that powers PyPI. See the `PSF blog post about the MOSS grant <https://pyfound.blogspot.com/2017/11/the-psf-awarded-moss-grant-pypi.html>`_. |
| Line 28: | Line 28: |
| = Administration = | Administration =============== |
| Line 30: | Line 31: |
| * Donald Stufft <donald@python.org> (chair?) * Ewa Jodlowska <ewa@python.org> (co-chair?) |
* Donald Stufft <donald@python.org> (chair) * Ewa Jodlowska <ewa@python.org> (co-chair) * `PSF Packaging WG Charter <https://wiki.python.org/psf/PackagingWG/Charter/>`_ |
| Line 34: | Line 36: |
| = Members = | Members ======= |
| Line 36: | Line 39: |
| * Who? Should we keep this limited? | * Donald Stufft * Ewa Jodlowska * Nathaniel J. Smith * Nick Coghlan * Nicole Harris * Sumana Harihareswara * Ernest W. Durbin III * Dustin Ingram * Mark Mangoba * Kenneth Reitz * Laura Hampton (non-voting member) * (others will be added as they accept their invitation to the WG) Meetings ======== As needed. Warehouse --------- MOSS-funded project: * `Kickoff meeting, Monday, Dec. 4, 2017 <https://wiki.python.org/psf/PackagingWG/2017-12-04-Warehouse>`_ * `Milestone discussion, Thursday, Dec. 7, 2017 <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2017-December/031803.html>`_ * Developer experience audit walkthrough, Tuesday, December 12, 2017 * `Maintainer MVP milestone bug triage, Tuesday, Dec. 19, 2017 <https://wiki.python.org/psf/PackagingWG/2017-12-19-Warehouse>`_ |
| Line 39: | Line 68: |
| = Meetings = As Needed? Not Needed? = Governance = |
Governance ============== |
| Line 48: | Line 73: |
TBD: Does this make sense? The other WG's don't seem to have it but the example does. Is there a better option here? If we open this open to lots of members this could become difficult to deal with. |
Agenda
The purpose of this working group is to support the larger efforts of improving and maintaining the packaging ecosystem in Python through fundraising and disbursement of raised funds. It will largely focus on efforts such as PyPI, pip, packaging.python.org, setuptools, and cross project efforts.
Resources
- Discussion: Slack and mailing list. The archives will be set to private since there will be voting.
- Accounting: We will rely on the PSF's donation and accounting mechanisms to raise funds and disburse them to the selected recipients.
Current Projects
- Support the implementation & deployment of Warehouse (PyPI 2.0) to replace the legacy code base that powers PyPI. See the PSF blog post about the MOSS grant.
Administration
- Donald Stufft <donald@python.org> (chair)
- Ewa Jodlowska <ewa@python.org> (co-chair)
- PSF Packaging WG Charter
Members
- Donald Stufft
- Ewa Jodlowska
- Nathaniel J. Smith
- Nick Coghlan
- Nicole Harris
- Sumana Harihareswara
- Ernest W. Durbin III
- Dustin Ingram
- Mark Mangoba
- Kenneth Reitz
- Laura Hampton (non-voting member)
- (others will be added as they accept their invitation to the WG)
Meetings
As needed.
Warehouse
MOSS-funded project:
- Kickoff meeting, Monday, Dec. 4, 2017
- Milestone discussion, Thursday, Dec. 7, 2017
- Developer experience audit walkthrough, Tuesday, December 12, 2017
- Maintainer MVP milestone bug triage, Tuesday, Dec. 19, 2017
Governance
Decisions on what fundraising and projects/efforts to support will be done by a simple majority and in the case of a tie, will escalate to the PSF Board.