Differences between revisions 1 and 10 (spanning 9 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2016-05-20 14:40:31
Size: 1500
Editor: EwaJodlowska
Comment:
Revision 10 as of 2017-09-21 19:48:20
Size: 1537
Editor: EwaJodlowska
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
#acl All:read #acl PackagingWGGroup:read,write,revert, All:read
#format rst
Line 3: Line 4:
NOTE: This is still a draft and not yet finalized.

= Agenda =
Agenda
======
Line 13: Line 13:
= Resources = Resources
==========
Line 15: Line 16:
* Discussion, TBD: Will we want primarily realtime communication (Slack?) or
  primarily asynchronous (Discourse? Mailing lists?). Will we want this to be
  private or public to outsiders?
* Discussion: Slack and mailing list. The archives will be set to private since there will be voting.
Line 22: Line 21:
= Current Projects = Current Projects
================
Line 28: Line 28:
= Administration = Administration
===============
Line 30: Line 31:
* Donald Stufft <donald@python.org> (chair?)
* Ewa Jodlowska <ewa@python.org> (co-chair?)
* Donald Stufft <donald@python.org> (chair)
* Ewa Jodlowska <ewa@python.org> (co-chair)
* `PSF Packaging WG Charter <https://wiki.python.org/psf/PackagingWG/Charter/>`_
Line 34: Line 36:
= Members = Members
=======
Line 36: Line 39:
* Who? Should we keep this limited? * Donald Stufft
* Ewa Jodlowska
* Nathaniel J. Smith
* Nick Coghlan
* Nicole Harris
* Sumana Harihareswara
* Ernest W. Durbin III
* Dustin Ingram
* Mark Mangoba
* Kenneth Reitz
* (others will be added as they accept their invitation to the WG)

Meetings
========

As Needed
Line 39: Line 57:
= Meetings =

As Needed? Not Needed?


= Governance =
Governance
==============
Line 48: Line 62:

TBD: Does this make sense? The other WG's don't seem to have it but the example
     does. Is there a better option here? If we open this open to lots of
     members this could become difficult to deal with.

Agenda

The purpose of this working group is to support the larger efforts of improving and maintaining the packaging ecosystem in Python through fundraising and disbursement of raised funds. It will largely focus on efforts such as PyPI, pip, packaging.python.org, setuptools, and cross project efforts.

Resources

  • Discussion: Slack and mailing list. The archives will be set to private since there will be voting.
  • Accounting: We will rely on the PSF's donation and accounting mechanisms to raise funds and disburse them to the selected recipients.

Current Projects

  • Support the implementation & deployment of Warehouse (PyPI 2.0) to replace the legacy code base that powers PyPI.

Administration

Members

  • Donald Stufft
  • Ewa Jodlowska
  • Nathaniel J. Smith
  • Nick Coghlan
  • Nicole Harris
  • Sumana Harihareswara
  • Ernest W. Durbin III
  • Dustin Ingram
  • Mark Mangoba
  • Kenneth Reitz
  • (others will be added as they accept their invitation to the WG)

Meetings

As Needed

Governance

Decisions on what fundraising and projects/efforts to support will be done by a simple majority and in the case of a tie, will escalate to the PSF Board.

PackagingWG (last edited 2025-01-13 07:09:39 by AlyssaCoghlan)

Unable to view page? See the FrontPage for instructions.