Differences between revisions 12 and 15 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 12 as of 2004-10-21 21:43:24
Size: 2002
Editor: TimPeters
Comment:
Revision 15 as of 2004-11-22 04:24:00
Size: 2190
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
Documents (these will eventually have to be moved elsewhere): == PSF License ==
Line 5: Line 5:
 * PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseV2Easy -- the current license, just stripped of version numbers. '''Important''':  See PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseFaq before
u
sing the following licenses.
Line 7: Line 8:
 * PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseV2Revised -- minor revision of the following, incorporating feedback.  * PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseV2Easy -- Approved Oct 22, 2004 as the official Python Software Foundation License Version 2
Line 9: Line 10:
 * PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseV2 -- Python Software Foundation License Version 2  * PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseV2Revised -- Revised license that may be used as the basis for Version 3 in the future.
Line 11: Line 12:
 * PythonSoftwareFoundationContribAgreements -- Python Software Foundation Contribution Agreement(s)  * PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseV2 -- Old draft for Python Software Foundation License Version 2 (not adopted and now defunct)
Line 16: Line 17:

== PSF Software Contribution Agreement ==

 * PythonSoftwareFoundationContribAgreementV2 -- Python Software Foundation Contribution Agreement

This page will collect information about the Python Software Foundation, and its committees.

PSF License

Important: See PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseFaq before using the following licenses.

Older wiki materials can be found here:

PSF Software Contribution Agreement

Discussion

I've always wondered:

How do modules become part of the Python distribution? What kind of process do you follow, what groups do you participate in, to become a part of that?

I've looked around, but haven't found any web pages on the subject.

-- LionKimbro DateTime(2004-06-28T21:22:21Z)

Answer: The final decision is by BDFL pronouncement, but the usual process is that the module is first written as a stand-alone module, and released. After it's been in use for some time, the author makes the suggestion in comp.lang.python or python-dev (both are used, I'm not sure which is preferred) that it be adopted into the standard distribution. This gets discussed by the usual crowd and usually the answer is obvious long before it ever gets to Guido. Certain modules skip the stand-along stage and are adopted directly into the standard library, but that is usually because the module was written in response to requests, and frequently by an experienced python core developer. If you are interested in getting your module adopted into the core, the #1 question you are sure to be asked is "are you willing to commit to supporting this module for at least the next 5 years?", because unless SOMEONE is willing to volunteer to provide that support the module can't be accepted.

-- MichaelChermside

PythonSoftwareFoundation (last edited 2021-10-14 21:17:03 by Srinivas Ramakrishna)

Unable to edit the page? See the FrontPage for instructions.