|
Size: 881
Comment:
|
← Revision 20 as of 2011-12-15 14:47:08 ⇥
Size: 985
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| The current way Python enchancements are officially considered is described (insert-link). | The current way Python enhancements are officially considered is described in [[http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/|PEP 1]]. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| This forum might be a better way to capture and discuss enhancements until consensus is achieved - then put through the more formal process. | This wiki page can be used to capture and discuss enhancements before putting them through the more formal process. |
| Line 10: | Line 11: |
| * SliceOverNegatives | |
| Line 13: | Line 15: |
| * Python3UnicodeDecodeError | |
| Line 18: | Line 21: |
| See also ["PEEPs"]. | See also [[PEEPs]]. |
| Line 24: | Line 27: |
| ["PEP3107FunctionAnnotationsRehash"] | [[PEP3107FunctionAnnotationsRehash]] [[Topically Organized PEP List]] |
The current way Python enhancements are officially considered is described in PEP 1.
This wiki page can be used to capture and discuss enhancements before putting them through the more formal process.
For now, put proposals forth here if you want to try and kick them around a bit and get some feedback before writing an official PEP.
Enhancement Proposals
About Using Wiki to Discuss Enhancement Proposals
Thoughts here on moving the official discussion of Python Enhancements from email to wiki.
See also PEEPs.
Discussion of Completed PEPs
Once a PEP is complete, altering the document to capture ongoing community input has a very high bar. Here are some PEP "rehash" pages.