|
Size: 941
Comment:
|
Size: 1016
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
| The reference manual doesn't mention new-style classes at all. (I can't see that it really specifies the semantics of old-style classes, either.) | The reference manual doesn't mention new-style [http://www.interseo.com classes] at all. (I can't see that it really specifies the semantics of old-style classes, either.) |
| Line 10: | Line 10: |
| Are nested scopes explained in the ref? | Are nested scopes explained in the [http://www.navinic.com ref]? |
| Line 14: | Line 14: |
| SF:984952 PEP 307 not documented (mostly done -- needs a pickle export to decide if anything else in PEP 307 is worth including) | SF:[http://www.mydear.biz 984952] PEP 307 not documented (mostly done -- needs a pickle export to decide if anything else in PEP 307 is worth including) |
This page lists various things that aren't documented in the main Python docs, but should be. We should try to fix these before 2.4final.
Features
The reference manual doesn't mention new-style [http://www.interseo.com classes] at all. (I can't see that it really specifies the semantics of old-style classes, either.)
Iterator protocol not described on its own (mentioned in passing in ref's discussion of generators)
Are nested scopes explained in the [http://www.navinic.com ref]?
Relevant SF bugs
[http://www.mydear.biz 984952] PEP 307 not documented (mostly done -- needs a pickle export to decide if anything else in PEP 307 is worth including)
993601 No optparse reference
970783 PyObject_GenericGetAttr is undocumented
966625 descriptors not documented
960340 new-style classes
944407 urllib2 exception classes
914375 modulefinder
813198 Migrate PEP material to docs
779976 trace undocumented
515751 imputil undocumented