Small discussion and evaluation of different parsers.
Name |
Grammar |
Module |
Python |
Comment |
[http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/module-shlex.html shlex] |
|
C |
included in distribution |
|
|
C |
|
lexical analysis module for Python |
|
|
Python |
|||
LL(1) |
Python |
1-any, 2-1.5+ |
||
LR(1) LALR(1) |
C |
|||
[http://www.pythonpros.com/arw/kwParsing/kwParsing.html kwParsing] |
|
|
||
|
C |
|
bison grammar with python code actions |
|
LR |
|
1.5.1+ |
||
|
Python |
|
Python Lex-Yacc |
|
[http://christophe.delord.free.fr/en/tpg/ ToyParserGenerator] |
|
|
2.2+ |
|
GLR |
C |
2.2+ |
grammar in doc strings |
|
- |
|
2.0+ |
requires mxTextTools |
|
|
Python |
2.0+ |
requires mxTextTools |
|
[http://www.lemburg.com/files/python/mxTextTools.html mxTextTools] |
- |
C |
is not exactly a parser like we're used to, but it is a fast text-processing engine |
Also see Python ParserSig @ http://www.python.org/sigs/parser-sig/ to discuss and select a standard parser generator for Python.
For some speed up one may use other parser generator systems and plug them in as modules.
For example:
["ANTLR"] (http://www.antlr.org/) generates C++ output (an older version with C output also available)
["Spirit"] (http://spirit.sourceforge.net/) framework for writing EBNF as C++ code
FlexBisonModule (http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mcguire/software/fbmodule/)
[http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=61g0ff%2439g%241%40vishnu.jussieu.fr cocktail compiler tools] approach