Differences between revisions 21 and 32 (spanning 11 versions)
Revision 21 as of 2004-07-01 11:38:15
Size: 4549
Editor: tunaworks-3
Comment: RecentChanges is still getting too wide
Revision 32 as of 2008-11-15 14:01:21
Size: 3490
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
See Wiki:JohannesGijsbers for more on me, but I'm subscribed to this page, so you can leave me messages here. See Wiki:JohannesGijsbers for more on me, but I'm subscribed to this page, so leave me messages here.

''On vacation for a while now.''
Line 6: Line 8:
So, if we had a nice pattern repository wiki, we could write about ''decorate-sort-undecorate'' there and link to it... ''{;D}='' -- LionKimbro [[DateTime(2003-11-21T22:18:39Z)]] So, if we had a nice pattern repository wiki, we could write about ''decorate-sort-undecorate'' there and link to it... ''{;D}='' -- LionKimbro <<DateTime(2003-11-21T22:18:39Z)>>
Line 61: Line 63:
-- LionKimbro [[DateTime(2003-11-22T04:45:20Z)]] -- LionKimbro <<DateTime(2003-11-22T04:45:20Z)>>
Line 83: Line 85:
Yes,yes, that's exactly it. Though I don't think it should polute ''this'' wiki. :) -- LionKimbro
Yes, yes, that's exactly it. Though I don't think it should pollute ''this'' wiki. :) -- LionKimbro
Line 86: Line 87:

The problem with RecentChanges getting too wide is simple (but probably not so simple to fix). You've got a table with column widths specified in a mix of absolute pixels and relative percentages, and that's a recipie for trouble. I'm tempted to say that the best fix would be to lose the space-wasting totem column on the left, but I suppose that's part of the "branding is more important than content" thing. :-( Failing that, I seem to recall having read about a couple of different ways of working around this sort of problem at alistapart.com. Or was it in ''Designing with Web Standards''? I can't lay hands on it just now...

----

Hi Johannes,

is there a chance for a moinmoin upgrade to 1.2.2? Sometimes the wiki is quite slow here. FastCgi, mod_python and twisted could help maybe. Maybe it is also cause by the mail server only sometimes working. Especially saves are slow.

BTW: Moin 1.2 has themes now, maybe you can use that for here.

-- MoinMoin:ThomasWaldmann

I'll look into it when my new SSH keys are up on creosote. -- JohannesGijsbers

Does this "too wide" problem noted at top of RecentChanges page still happen? -- ThomasWaldmann [[DateTime(2004-06-30T20:16:04Z)]]

Yes. Another thing I should look at when my keys are up. I've got a copy of 'Designing with Web Standards' here though, so I think I'll be able to fix it, thanks to the hint above. -- JohannesGijsbers
Johannes, Thanks for the message. I have read the spelling conventions. What bothered me was that you had used Wiki sometimes and wiki sometimes. I will go back to FrontPage and may the remaining cases consistent to the spelling conventions if that is ok. It looks like I made them consistent the wrong way,. ;o) --AndrewCates

See JohannesGijsbers for more on me, but I'm subscribed to this page, so leave me messages here.

On vacation for a while now.

Email: jlgijsbers at planet dot nl


So, if we had a nice pattern repository wiki, we could write about decorate-sort-undecorate there and link to it... {;D}= -- LionKimbro 2003-11-21 22:18:39

PortlandPatternRepository? ;) -- JohannesGijsbers

Two thoughts:

  • I'd like a focused design patterns community.

  • I'd like a block patterns community.

I think that there is a type of pattern that people use within a procedure.

For an example of a basic one, there is the ForLoop.

But there are also others, like FirstTimeSeperate versus FirstTimeIntegrated.

That is, do you:

   1 first_time_a()
   2 always_b()
   3 first_time_c()
   4 always_d()
   5 
   6 while condition:
   7   always_b()
   8   always_d()

...or do you...

   1 first=1
   2 
   3 while condition:
   4     if first: first_time_a()
   5     always_b()
   6     if first: first_time_c()
   7     always_d()
   8     first=0

Surely, there are advantages to each one, no?

I taught beginning programmers for 2 years. I found that I didn't have words for a lot of things that I was trying to explain to them. Now I think I have the word for it: a "block pattern."

I think a site of block patterns would be interesting, and very beneficial for study by beginners.

DecorateSortUndecorate may be a block pattern. But maybe not- maybe it's an algorithmic pattern. But are they that different?

Speaking of algorithms- we need multiple algorithms wiki. {:)}=

Good talking with you. Feel free to delete whenever you like.

-- LionKimbro 2003-11-22 04:45:20

What do you mean with a block pattern? It seems like another level of Scope (as in the DesignPatternsBook). -- JohannesGijsbers


As for DP: Yes, it is a matter of scope.

My design patterns book isn't about how you arrange your lines and variables within a function. It's about how you arrange your collection of classes, objects. I want "block design patterns," to give my students who are just trying to figure out how to write a function.

Like: "NestedLoops," to do things like cycling over lists of lists, and hitting all of them.

I've been programming since I was 7 years old. When I took CS in college, I got to watch people smarter than I am struggle with how to calculate out a multiplication table, or follow two pointers in a row.

I don't think they're stupid. I think that I just figured out, through trial and error, in my first years of programming, how to make these basic structures.

It'd be nice to have a systematic way to teach those basic "block" patterns. (I'm just making up the term.)

-- LionKimbro

I see what you're getting at. How about "ProceduralPatterns", with block patterns being one of the scopes involved. The other scope would probably be about splitting things up into functions. -- JohannesGijsbers

Yes, yes, that's exactly it. Though I don't think it should pollute this wiki. :) -- LionKimbro


Johannes, Thanks for the message. I have read the spelling conventions. What bothered me was that you had used Wiki sometimes and wiki sometimes. I will go back to FrontPage and may the remaining cases consistent to the spelling conventions if that is ok. It looks like I made them consistent the wrong way,. ;o) --AndrewCates


CategoryHomepage

JohannesGijsbers (last edited 2008-11-15 14:01:21 by localhost)

Unable to edit the page? See the FrontPage for instructions.