|
Size: 239
Comment:
|
← Revision 5 as of 2008-11-15 14:01:03 ⇥
Size: 963
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
| * This is just a configuration issue. [[http://issues.apache.org/jira/|The Apache JIRA]] has public read enabled. | |
| Line 8: | Line 9: |
== Questions == Bignose: According to the [[http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing.jsp|licensing and pricing]] page for Jira, it is non-free software. We can't examine, improve, or commission others to do these things to it. Why are we considering a non-free tracker for Python? The [[http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2006/06/request-for-test-trackers-to-get.html|word on the street]]: "We want the best solution possible without being political." Sounds like a minor BitKeeper incident in the making, but then SourceForge isn't entirely run on open source software, either. -- PaulBoddie |
Some experiences with Jira:
- SF conversions seems to work fine.
- needs login for every user, even for read.
This is just a configuration issue. The Apache JIRA has public read enabled.
- can do convenient mass edits, for example, I could assign all issues currently assigned to "loewis" to "mloewis".
Questions
Bignose:
According to the licensing and pricing page for Jira, it is non-free software. We can't examine, improve, or commission others to do these things to it. Why are we considering a non-free tracker for Python?
The word on the street: "We want the best solution possible without being political." Sounds like a minor BitKeeper incident in the making, but then SourceForge isn't entirely run on open source software, either. -- PaulBoddie