Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2004-04-06 16:54:37
Size: 1385
Editor: pcp07847899pcs
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2004-04-06 17:06:53
Size: 1243
Editor: MikeRovner
Comment: WikiName-ized names
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 13: Line 13:
See also [http://www.thinkware.se/cgi-bin/thinki.cgi/SelectingGuiToolkitForPython SelectingGuiToolkitForPython] and [http://developers.coedit.net/RapidPrototypingWithPython RapidPrototypingWithPython] for specific comparisons between some GUI toolkits. See also Thinki:SelectingGuiToolkitForPython and http://developers.coedit.net/RapidPrototypingWithPython for specific comparisons between some GUI toolkits.
Line 17: Line 17:
Not sure the right spot for this addition, but I'm looking for a comparision of Python vs. REALBasic for GUI Application development TIA, - Dean goodmansond@yahoo.com Not sure the right spot for this addition, but I'm looking for a comparision of Python vs. REALBasic for GUI Application development TIA, -- Dean goodmansond@yahoo.com
Line 19: Line 19:
 Python is free and open source and has hundreds more of (also free) libraries available. If you want a free (for Linux) GUI builder that is most similar to REALBasic & Visual Basic, see QT Designer and pyqt. To use QT Designer on Windows, see [http://www.thekompany.com/products/blackadder/ BlackAdder], but it is not free then. For Windows development though, wxPython is probably better than pyqt. PyGTK is also very nice.  Python is free and open source and has hundreds more of (also free) libraries available. If you want a free (for Linux) GUI builder that is most similar to REALBasic & Visual Basic, see QT Designer and PyQt. To use QT Designer on Windows, see BlackAdder, but it is not free then. For Windows development though, WxPython is probably better than Py``Qt. PyGtk is also very nice.

To compare libraries, it is often useful to have the same problem implemented using different libraries.

This could be one medium size application (this has been discussed in com.lang.python). But it could also be demo implementations of common GUI related tasks:

  • certain effects using layout managers
  • dynamic menus
  • loading key bindings from a configuration file (and changing menu labels and tooltips accordingly)

This could actually be the start of a cookbook for each toolkit.


See also SelectingGuiToolkitForPython and http://developers.coedit.net/RapidPrototypingWithPython for specific comparisons between some GUI toolkits.


Not sure the right spot for this addition, but I'm looking for a comparision of Python vs. REALBasic for GUI Application development TIA, -- Dean goodmansond@yahoo.com

  • Python is free and open source and has hundreds more of (also free) libraries available. If you want a free (for Linux) GUI builder that is most similar to REALBasic & Visual Basic, see QT Designer and PyQt. To use QT Designer on Windows, see BlackAdder, but it is not free then. For Windows development though, WxPython is probably better than PyQt. PyGtk is also very nice.

GuiProgrammingShootout (last edited 2010-01-26 21:22:13 by hmbg-4d06f2a5)

Unable to edit the page? See the FrontPage for instructions.