Differences between revisions 39 and 55 (spanning 16 versions)
Revision 39 as of 2004-03-16 05:42:31
Size: 9872
Editor: 1Cust123
Comment:
Revision 55 as of 2015-01-10 12:15:15
Size: 10616
Comment: uniform camel case writing of reStructuredText
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
(For the Docutils sprint at PyCon2007, see [[PyCon2007/DocutilsSprint]].
For the Docutils sprint at PyCon2006, see [[PyCon2006/Sprints/DocutilsSprint]].)
Line 3: Line 6:
PyConDC2004 is over. See [[http://starship.python.net/~goodger/pycon_dc_2004/|A Week at PyCon DC 2004]] for a narrative account of events.
Line 4: Line 9:
going on at ["PyConDC2004"], please see SprintPlan2004. going on at [[PyConDC2004]], please see SprintPlan2004.
Line 6: Line 11:
We may also have a birds-of-a-feather session; see DocutilsBof. We also had a birds-of-a-feather session; see DocutilsBof.
Line 8: Line 13:
Also see the [http://docutils.sourceforge.net Docutils home page] and the [http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html reStructuredText home page]. Also see the [[http://docutils.sourceforge.net|Docutils home page]] and the [[http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html|reStructuredText home page]].
Line 13: Line 18:
The sprints at ["PyConDC2004"] are to be held from March 20 (Saturday)
through March 23 (Tuesday), for a total of 4 days. I'm going to be there
for all 4 sprint days, so I invite sprinters to join in.  How long should the
Docutils
sprint be? It depends on the participants and the other sprints.
How
about separate Saturday/Sunday and Monday/Tuesday sprints?
The sprints at [[PyConDC2004]] were held from March 20 (Saturday)
through March 23 (Tuesday), for a total of 4 days. I was there
for all 4 sprint days, and sprinters joined in as they were able.
Line 19: Line 22:
Please voice your opinions here or [mailto:goodger@python.org email me]. Please feel free to comment here or [[mailto:goodger@python.org|email me]].
Line 24: Line 27:
There is no cost to attend the sprints beyond registering for Py``Con
(and
being present, of course).
There was no cost to attend the sprints beyond being present.
Line 30: Line 32:
Everyone is welcome! No prior Docutils hacking experience is required.
Participants should either be experienced Python programmers, or interested
Everyone was welcome! No prior Docutils hacking experience was required.
Participants were either experienced Python programmers, or interested
Line 34: Line 36:
Please [mailto:goodger@python.org email me] or
edit this page directly if you'd like to participate.
Here are the sprinters who attended:
Line 37: Line 38:
 * [mailto:goodger@python.org David Goodger] (coach)
 *
[mailto:oliver@rutherfurd.net Ollie Rutherfurd]
 *
[mailto:fdrake@acm.org Fred Drake] (Saturday and Sunday)
 *
[mailto:ianb@colorstudy.com Ian Bicking] (but I'm not really sure which sprint I will attend)
 *
[mailto:aahz@pythoncraft.com Aahz] (All four days)
 * [mailto:edloper@gradient.cis.upenn.edu Edward Loper] (All four days?)
 * [mailto:tracer@axiomfire.com Tracy Ruggles] (mon & tue, maybe sat and sun)
 *
[mailto:gilbert@voxmea.net Matt Gilbert] (All four days)
 * [mailto:sholden@holdenweb.com Steve Holden] (Saturday and Sunday)
 * [[mailto:goodger@python.org|David Goodger]] (coach)
 * [
[mailto:oliver@rutherfurd.net|Ollie Rutherfurd]] (Saturday and Sunday)
 * [
[mailto:fdrake@acm.org|Fred Drake]] (Saturday)
 * [
[mailto:ianb@colorstudy.com|Ian Bicking]] (Saturday, Monday, & Tuesday)
 * [
[mailto:aahz@pythoncraft.com|Aahz]] (All four days)
 * [[mailto:edloper@gradient.cis.upenn.edu|Edward Loper]] (Sunday through Tuesday)
 * [[mailto:tracer@axiom
fire.com|Tracy Ruggles]] (Sunday & Tuesday?)
 * [[mailto:gilbert@voxmea.net|Matt Gilbert]] (All four days)
 * [[mailto:sholden@holdenweb.com|Steve Holden]] (Saturday and Sunday)
 * Bill Sconce (all four days)
 * Andrew Kuchling (Saturday)
 * Reggie Dugard (Sunday through Tuesday)
 * Mike Orr (Monday)
 * Lloyd Kvam (Tuesday)
 * Laura Creighton (Sunday through Tuesday)
 * Jacob Hallen (Sunday through Tuesday)
Line 50: Line 58:
This sprint and my participation at ["PyConDC2004"] are being sponsored by
Silver Sponsor [http://WingIDE.com Archaeopteryx Software], the
[http://www.python.org/psf Python Software Foundation (PSF)], and individual
This sprint and my participation at [[PyConDC2004]] were sponsored by
Silver Sponsor [[http://WingIDE.com|Wing IDE (Archaeopteryx Software)]], the
[[http://www.python.org/psf|Python Software Foundation (PSF)]], and individual
Line 58: Line 66:
What would participants like to accomplish? Choose from among the
ideas below or add new ones. Register your votes below, and feel free
to comment.
Each sprint day began with an interactive overview of the Docutils architecture and codebase.
Line 62: Line 68:
The sprint should begin with an introduction to Docutils and
reStructuredText: their purpose, future direction, and current
implementation. How long should it be? Should there be a long
preliminary lecture covering a lot of ground, or a minimal overview
(with the possibility of further dicsussions as needed)?
I will update this page with actual results from the sprint. For now,
here is the original list of ideas for the sprint, in no particular order:
Line 68: Line 71:
Here are ideas for the sprint, in no particular order:

* Python source reader (autodocumentation subsystem). There's a lot of support for this. Ideas:
   *
[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/pep-0258.html#python-source-reader PEP 258]
   * [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/pysource.html detailed exploration of some ideas]
   * [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#python-source-reader notes]
   * [http://docutils.sf.net/docutils/readers/python/ DavidG's module parser code (incomplete)]
   * [http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/davidg/pysource_reader DavidG's sandbox code (incomplete)]
   * [http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/tibs/ Tibs' sandbox code (incomplete)]
   * [http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/ianb/extractor/ IanB's sandbox code (hack)]
 * '''PROGRESS!''' Python source reader (autodocumentation subsystem). There's a lot of support for this. Ideas:
   * [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/pep-0258.html#python-source-reader|PEP 258]]
   * [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/pysource.html|detailed exploration of some ideas]]
   * [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#python-source-reader|notes]]
   * [[http://docutils.sf.net/docutils/readers/python/|DavidG's module parser code (incomplete)]]
   * [[http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/davidg/pysource_reader|DavidG's sandbox code (incomplete)]]
   * [[http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/tibs/|Tibs' sandbox code (incomplete)]]
   * [[http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/ianb/extractor/|IanB's sandbox code (hack)]]
Line 80: Line 81:
 * Test framework -- extend unittest with support for packages of test modules (i.e., integrate [http://docutils.sf.net/test/package_unittest.py this] into unittest.py).  * Test framework -- extend unittest with support for packages of test modules (i.e., integrate [[http://docutils.sf.net/test/package_unittest.py|this]] into unittest.py).
Line 82: Line 83:
 * Doc``Py (Python's dialect of LaTeX) writer completion -- would allow easier entry for documentation newbies, "make authorship more accessible" ([http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/dkuhlman/ initial implementation]). ''This would be a major interest for me, I would like to make the Python docs more accessible to new authors -- SH''  * '''PROGRESS!''' Doc``Py (Python's dialect of LaTeX) writer completion -- would allow easier entry for documentation newbies, "make authorship more accessible" ([[http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/edloper/docpy/|initial implementation]]). ''This would be a major interest for me, I would like to make the Python docs more accessible to new authors -- SH''
Line 84: Line 85:
 * HTML fragment writer -- establish API (useful for ht2html and templating systems). ([http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#html-fragments Notes], and [http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/oliverr/ht/ related work].) Fred Drake and Mike Orr are both interested in this.  * '''DONE!''' Add an [[http://docutils.sourceforge.net/sandbox/edloper/epytext|epytext parser]] (requires [[http://epydoc.sourceforge.net|epydoc]]).
Line 86: Line 87:
 * [http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xhtml2-20030506/ XHTML 2.0] writer. Though the spec is in the "working draft" stage, it would be nice to start experimenting with it. -- ''Fred Drake''  * '''DONE!''' HTML fragment writer -- establish API (useful for ht2html and templating systems). ([[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#html-fragments|Notes]], and [[http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/oliverr/ht/|related work]].) Fred Drake and Mike Orr are both interested in this.

   Reggie Dugard implemented a new docutils.core.publish_parts() convenience function, with Mike Orr's initial help.

 * [[http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xhtml2-20030506/|XHTML 2.0]] writer. Though the spec is in the "working draft" stage, it would be nice to start experimenting with it. -- ''Fred Drake''
Line 90: Line 95:
   [http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/aahz/OO/ Aahz's sandbox] & mods in
   [http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/pobrien/OpenOffice/ Patrick O'Brien's sandbox])
   [[http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/aahz/OO/|Aahz's sandbox]] & mods in
   [[http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/pobrien/OpenOffice/|Patrick O'Brien's sandbox]])
Line 93: Line 98:
   * Doc``Book ([http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/oliverr/docbook/ Oliver Rutherfurd's sandbox])    * '''PROGRESS!''' Doc``Book ([[http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/oliverr/docbook/|Oliver Rutherfurd's sandbox]])
Line 96: Line 101:
 * Aahz will be running a sprint to create a base protocol for binary  * '''PROGRESS!''' Aahz will be running a sprint to create a base protocol for binary
Line 100: Line 105:
 * Interpreted text [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#role-bindings role bindings].  * Interpreted text [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#role-bindings|role bindings]].
Line 102: Line 107:
 * [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#large-documents Large document] issues, including [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#object-numbering-and-object-references formal elements].  * [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#large-documents|Large document]] issues, including [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#object-numbering-and-object-references|formal elements]].
Line 104: Line 109:
 * Nested inline markup -- may require new inline markup parser with proper tokenization & lexing. Or stack-based. Currently under discussion on the [http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-develop docutils-develop mailing list]. David Abrahams has checked in an initial implementation to the "nesting" branch under CVS.  * Nested inline markup -- may require new inline markup parser with proper tokenization & lexing. Or stack-based. Currently under discussion on the [[http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-develop|docutils-develop mailing list]]. David Abrahams has checked in an initial implementation to the "nesting" branch under CVS.
Line 106: Line 111:
 * [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#math-markup Math markup].  * [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#math-markup|Math markup]].
Line 108: Line 113:
 * Complete [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/doctree.html "The Docutils Document Tree"] reference doc.  * '''PROGRESS!''' Complete [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/doctree.html|"The Docutils Document Tree"]] reference doc.
Line 110: Line 115:
 * Wikis ([http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/ianb/wiki/ Ian Bicking's sandbox], [http://docutils.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html#are-there-any-wikis-that-use-restructuredtext-syntax FAQ entry]). If MoinMoin is python.org's official wiki, it would be nice if it fully supported reStructuredText ;-).  * '''PROGRESS!''' Wikis ([[http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/ianb/wiki/|Ian Bicking's sandbox]], [[http://docutils.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html#are-there-any-wikis-that-use-restructuredtext-syntax|FAQ entry]]). If MoinMoin is python.org's official wiki, it would be nice if it fully supported reStructuredText ;-).
Line 112: Line 117:
 * [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#bugs Squash bugs]  * '''PROGRESS!''' [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#bugs|Squash bugs]]
Line 114: Line 119:
 * Add internationalization to [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#footer-boilerplate-text footer boilerplate text].  * Add internationalization to [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#footer-boilerplate-text|footer boilerplate text]].
Line 116: Line 121:
 * [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#adaptable-file-extensions Adaptable file extensions].  * [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#adaptable-file-extensions|Adaptable file extensions]].
Line 118: Line 123:
 * [http://docutils.sf.net/tools/editors/emacs Emacs reStructuredText mode].  * [[http://docutils.sf.net/tools/editors/emacs|Emacs reStructuredText mode]].
Line 120: Line 125:
 * [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/semantics.html Docstring semantics].  * [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/semantics.html|Docstring semantics]].
Line 122: Line 127:
 * Extend EpyDoc support for ReStructuredText (e.g., for LaTeX output).  * Extend EpyDoc support for reStructuredText (e.g., for LaTeX output).
Line 131: Line 136:
There are more ideas in the [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#to-do Docutils to-do list].  * '''DONE!''' implemented a directive to embed the ABC music notation in reStructuredText.

There are more ideas in the [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#to-do|Docutils to-do list]].
Line 146: Line 153:
An enhanced client API with better support for [http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#html-fragments writing fragments] would be ''really'' nice to have; I'd be willing to spend some time on that as well. Each time I have tried to make a simple script that used docutils in some way, the API has been difficult to figure out. It may be that documentation is all that's needed, or just a more-visible entry point into existing documentation, but I know how hard that is to do. I think it would be worth having at least a little brain-storming session to figure out where people are getting hung up on the API and letting you tell us how much of it is there in some form already, and guiding an effort to make it more effectively exposed. Whether that's documentation, a little code, or a pile of new stuff, I don't know, but my past explorations make me think there's some limited amount of "API stuff" that needs to be done. It is unlikely I'll be able to sprint on this topic Monday/Tuesday though. -- ''Fred Drake'' An enhanced client API with better support for [[http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#html-fragments|writing fragments]] would be ''really'' nice to have; I'd be willing to spend some time on that as well. Each time I have tried to make a simple script that used docutils in some way, the API has been difficult to figure out. It may be that documentation is all that's needed, or just a more-visible entry point into existing documentation, but I know how hard that is to do. I think it would be worth having at least a little brain-storming session to figure out where people are getting hung up on the API and letting you tell us how much of it is there in some form already, and guiding an effort to make it more effectively exposed. Whether that's documentation, a little code, or a pile of new stuff, I don't know, but my past explorations make me think there's some limited amount of "API stuff" that needs to be done. It is unlikely I'll be able to sprint on this topic Monday/Tuesday though. -- ''Fred Drake''
Line 151: Line 158:

I'd love to get the Doc``Book writer finished up -- I think it's pretty close. It needs tests, better bibliographic field handling, and probably a bit of polishing. -- ''Ollie Rutherfurd''

(For the Docutils sprint at PyCon2007, see PyCon2007/DocutilsSprint. For the Docutils sprint at PyCon2006, see PyCon2006/Sprints/DocutilsSprint.)

Preliminaries

PyConDC2004 is over. See A Week at PyCon DC 2004 for a narrative account of events.

For introductory information and information about the other sprints going on at PyConDC2004, please see SprintPlan2004.

We also had a birds-of-a-feather session; see DocutilsBof.

Also see the Docutils home page and the reStructuredText home page.

Duration

The sprints at PyConDC2004 were held from March 20 (Saturday) through March 23 (Tuesday), for a total of 4 days. I was there for all 4 sprint days, and sprinters joined in as they were able.

Please feel free to comment here or email me.

Cost

There was no cost to attend the sprints beyond being present.

Sprinters

Everyone was welcome! No prior Docutils hacking experience was required. Participants were either experienced Python programmers, or interested in documentation.

Here are the sprinters who attended:

Sponsorship

This sprint and my participation at PyConDC2004 were sponsored by Silver Sponsor Wing IDE (Archaeopteryx Software), the Python Software Foundation (PSF), and individual contributors. Thank you all!

Sprint Topic Ideas

Each sprint day began with an interactive overview of the Docutils architecture and codebase.

I will update this page with actual results from the sprint. For now, here is the original list of ideas for the sprint, in no particular order:

There are more ideas in the Docutils to-do list.

Comments

Please feel free to add any comments you like. Include your name for feedback; anonymous comments OK too. I hope to see you at PyCon! -- David Goodger

I shan't be able to make PyCon (no surprise there), but I hope the sprint goes really well. I have no objection at all if one of the items of work is the pysource reader, whether based on my work or not - indeed, I'd love to see a working implementation out there. -- Tibs

I'd be very interested in working on the/a Python source code reader -- it seems like the giant missing piece of docutils. -- Ian Bicking

Two 2-day sprints would be better for me. I wasn't planning to attend any sprint, but Docutils is tempting me. I'd most likely attend Monday-Tuesday. I'm not that good at understanding intricate parser code, but perhaps I can work on some other aspect. My wishlist item is for the HTML generator to just produce an HTML fragment I can plug into a larger page, rather than all the header/footer/style stuff it adds. There has also been much interest in our local Python user group about having a ReST syntax in MoinMoin. -- Mike Orr

An enhanced client API with better support for writing fragments would be really nice to have; I'd be willing to spend some time on that as well. Each time I have tried to make a simple script that used docutils in some way, the API has been difficult to figure out. It may be that documentation is all that's needed, or just a more-visible entry point into existing documentation, but I know how hard that is to do. I think it would be worth having at least a little brain-storming session to figure out where people are getting hung up on the API and letting you tell us how much of it is there in some form already, and guiding an effort to make it more effectively exposed. Whether that's documentation, a little code, or a pile of new stuff, I don't know, but my past explorations make me think there's some limited amount of "API stuff" that needs to be done. It is unlikely I'll be able to sprint on this topic Monday/Tuesday though. -- Fred Drake

I'll probably be there for all four days. Anyone who's interested in automatic API documentation generation might want to take a look at EpyDoc, which currently supports reStructuredText. I'd like to work on extending it with better docutils support, and improve it in other ways. -- Edward Loper

I use EpyDoc quite a bit, and would like to help with it's docutils support. And, just in general, would like to help out the docutils project. -- Tracy Ruggles

I'd love to get the DocBook writer finished up -- I think it's pretty close. It needs tests, better bibliographic field handling, and probably a bit of polishing. -- Ollie Rutherfurd

DocutilsSprint (last edited 2015-01-10 12:15:15 by WolfgangMaier)

Unable to edit the page? See the FrontPage for instructions.