2527
Comment:
|
2783
remove some tasks, SF->Roundup
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 22: | Line 22: |
'''discuss and debug comments system''' | |
Line 23: | Line 24: |
== Conversion == | The comments system is quite new and untested. How it deals with inline comments is not ideal. |
Line 25: | Line 26: |
When we find the toolset reasonably complete, we'll convert both the Python 2.6 and Python 3.0 SVN documentation branches to the new system. The conversion itself is (should be, you'll see yourself) painless, but it can't do everything right. For example, as the toplevel documents were completely separate until now, you couldn't directly link from, e.g. the library reference to a specific section of the language reference. These links will have to be corrected. | '''write a "printable" (PDF) builder (export to latex, most probably)''' |
Line 27: | Line 28: |
All these tasks to do after conversion are listed in the ``doctools/converter/newfiles/TODO`` file, which is copied to the reST source tree on conversion. | Of course, printable output was trivial for LaTeX sources. The Docutils do have a latex writer (two in fact) -- if it is stable enough to be used, it has to be extended to support our extra node types. Else, some other conversion must be devised. |
Line 29: | Line 30: |
All other tasks that are independent of the converter are collected in ``doctools/TODO``. | '''prepare for databases other than sqlite for comments''' Does sqlite scale well enough for our comments? Though I think so, we should be prepared to make it easy to substitute something like postgres. '''look at the old tools/ scripts, what functionality should be rewritten''' There were quite a few tools in `Doc/tools/`, e.g. looking which modules were documented. Some of this functionality is obsolete now, some of it may be useful. '''Py-in-the-sky ideas''' add search via Xapian? optionally have a contents tree view in the sidebar (AJAX based)? |
Line 34: | Line 47: |
Of course, before the conversion changes to existing documents have to be made in LaTeX to the original sources. However, you can already start extending and editing the "new" sources in `converter/newfiles` which don't have a LaTeX counterpart. | '''Roundup bugs''' |
Line 36: | Line 49: |
'''SF bugs''' | There are lots of bugs and feature requests in the Python issue tracker at http://bugs.python.org/, and even the occasional patch with category "Documentation". However, most of these are pretty big tasks though, such as (mostly obscure or advanced) features that are not documented, or documented not in the official docs, but some essay (new-style classes!). |
Line 38: | Line 51: |
There are lots of SF bugs and feature requests, and even the occasional patch with category "Documentation". However, most of these are pretty big tasks though, such as (mostly obscure or advanced) features that are not documented, or documented not in the official docs, but some essay (new-style classes!). | If you tackle an issue, mention the issue number in the commit message or in the patch email, and I will close the report accordingly. |
Line 40: | Line 53: |
The bug tracker is at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5470&atid=105470, the RFE and patches trackers can be reached through the "Tracker" menu at the page top. | '''In the Wiki''' There are also quite a few wiki pages concerning things missing from the documentation, see MissingFromDocumentation and CategoryDocumentation. |
Tasks
for the documentation team
Coding tasks
for those who want to develop the toolset
Get into the code
The first task for those who want to develop the toolset is to make themselves familiar with it. There are two documents, called doctools/README and doctools/HACKING, which give a short introduction how to use the command line tools and how the code is laid out. Feel free to amend!
Improvement suggestions
- I'd like to ask all of you to look at the new built documentation and collect thoughts about it -- not the content, but mainly the infrastructure such as navigational elements, accessibility etc.
Note that the web application does use JavaScript in some places, but only for better usability (hopefully). Users without JavaScript may not lose any functionality. (This should be confirmed every now and then.)
The TODO file
The doctools/TODO file lists some things that should be done. At the moment, these are:
discuss and debug comments system
- The comments system is quite new and untested. How it deals with inline comments is not ideal.
write a "printable" (PDF) builder (export to latex, most probably)
- Of course, printable output was trivial for LaTeX sources. The Docutils do have a latex writer (two in fact) -- if it is stable enough to be used, it has to be extended to support our extra node types. Else, some other conversion must be devised.
prepare for databases other than sqlite for comments
- Does sqlite scale well enough for our comments? Though I think so, we should be prepared to make it easy to substitute something like postgres.
look at the old tools/ scripts, what functionality should be rewritten
There were quite a few tools in Doc/tools/, e.g. looking which modules were documented. Some of this functionality is obsolete now, some of it may be useful.
Py-in-the-sky ideas
- add search via Xapian? optionally have a contents tree view in the sidebar (AJAX based)?
Content tasks
Roundup bugs
There are lots of bugs and feature requests in the Python issue tracker at http://bugs.python.org/, and even the occasional patch with category "Documentation". However, most of these are pretty big tasks though, such as (mostly obscure or advanced) features that are not documented, or documented not in the official docs, but some essay (new-style classes!). If you tackle an issue, mention the issue number in the commit message or in the patch email, and I will close the report accordingly.
In the Wiki
There are also quite a few wiki pages concerning things missing from the documentation, see MissingFromDocumentation and CategoryDocumentation.