Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2015-07-17 14:31:46
Size: 1682
Editor: CarrieAnne
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2015-07-18 07:16:27
Size: 1765
Editor: CarrieAnne
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
Line 3: Line 2:
Line 6: Line 4:
1) We're a meeting point for people who want to make practical contributions to Python in education.  * We're a meeting point for people who want to make practical contributions to Python in education.
 * We identify and coordinate projects that deliver specific and measurable results that support our aims.
 * We support and facilitate such projects so they have the best chance of meeting their goals.
Line 8: Line 8:
2) We identify and coordinate projects that deliver specific and measurable results that support our aims.

3) We support and facilitate such projects so they have the best chance of meeting their goals.
Line 34: Line 31:
 * If funding is required, then propsals will be submitted to the PSF board for approval.
Line 51: Line 50:

Purpose & Common Goals

The initial purpose of this workgroup is to further the PSF's education mission. As a working group we make things happen. We do this in three ways:

  • We're a meeting point for people who want to make practical contributions to Python in education.
  • We identify and coordinate projects that deliver specific and measurable results that support our aims.
  • We support and facilitate such projects so they have the best chance of meeting their goals.

Core Values & Internal Government

The core values for this group are:

  • Respect
  • Support
  • Positive Atmosphere
  • Constructiveness
  • Integrity

The workgroup adopts the PSF Code of Conduct (https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/). Any actions (found by a majority) made against the principles in the Code of Conduct will result in the acting person being removed from the workgroup.

Rules & Guidelines

  • the education workgroup will

Decision Making Procedures

  • Projects will be proposed to the group.
  • The requests will be discussed on the mailing list.
  • The team will vote on the proposals. Decisions will be made by a majority rule.
  • If funding is required, then propsals will be submitted to the PSF board for approval.

Communication Plan

The team will communicate via the PythonEdu-WG mailing list. If needed, conference calls can be set up. The method of voting on projects and proposals will be determined by the WG. (The preferred way of voting is email voting.)

Budget

  • TBD

List of Participants/Who we are

Moderators:

  • Carrie Anne Philbin

Participants:

  • TBD

Support Requirements

  • TBD

PythonEduWGCharter (last edited 2015-08-12 14:43:40 by MarcAndreLemburg)

Unable to view page? See the FrontPage for instructions.