Differences between revisions 12 and 13
Revision 12 as of 2006-01-12 02:12:06
Size: 2526
Editor: 66
Comment:
Revision 13 as of 2008-11-15 13:59:51
Size: 2512
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 46: Line 46:
-- JohannesGijsbers [[DateTime(2002-12-07T03:34:05)]] -- JohannesGijsbers <<DateTime(2002-12-07T03:34:05)>>
Line 50: Line 50:
 This sounds a lot like [:lwickjr/Modules: lwickjr/Modules]/Alias.py when coupled with a module of shell-command functions. See ["lwickjr/Modules"] for further information.
  --["lwickjr"]
 This sounds a lot like [[lwickjr/Modules]]/Alias.py when coupled with a module of shell-command functions. See [[lwickjr/Modules]] for further information.
  --[[lwickjr]]
Line 73: Line 73:
The killall function was rejected by the ["BDFL"]. As far as I can see from the The killall function was rejected by the [[BDFL]]. As far as I can see from the
Line 78: Line 78:
 * [http://www.gregorpurdy.com/gregor/psh/ The Perl Shell]  * [[http://www.gregorpurdy.com/gregor/psh/|The Perl Shell]]

The idea: using the Python interpreter as an InteractiveShell.

Command execution

Use short method names:

   1 def S(arg):
   2   """returns string of executed command arg"""
   3   return os.popen(arg).read()
   4 
   5 def SN(arg):
   6   """returns list of executed command arg"""
   7   return os.popen(arg).read().split('\n')
   8 
   9 def SP(arg):
  10   """prints string of executed command arg"""
  11   print S(arg)
  12 
  13 def SNP(arg):
  14   """prints with lines list executed command arg"""
  15   for i in SN(arg):
  16     print i

Command execution is the one thing an InteractiveShell has to be good at. Typing S("<command>") is too much overhead for command execution. Still, a mixture of bash style command execution and shell programming with Python would be great.


I'd want the simple style of command execution from bash available:

cd /foo/bar

But also the Python style for more complex commands:

os.setcwd('/foo/bar')

Some ways to execute the bash-style command:

  • Use os.popen(<command>).

  • Map all commands to Python functions: cd(), less(), all taking a list of strings as arguments.
  • Completely separate bash-style commands from Python commands, executing it with bash.

-- JohannesGijsbers 2002-12-07 03:34:05

There is a project that attempts to acheive this. Quasi (http://quasi-shell.sourceforge.net/) provides a shell within which Python can be freely mixed with OS (and certain database) commands. -- BenLast

Path manipulation

The os.path module provides a good set of functions for path manipulation, but you might also want to split the path at the root:

   1 import re
   2 def splitroot(s):
   3   if string.find(s,"/") == -1:
   4     return '',s
   5   if s[0] == '/':
   6     s = s[1:]
   7   m = re.match("(.*?)/(.*)$",s)
   8   return m.groups()

awk comparables

Simply use the re module. It's a fuller set of regular expressions. Create a wrapper function for a utility for this if you want call it inlinegrep.

Limitations

The killall function was rejected by the BDFL. As far as I can see from the previous version of this page, Guido rejected it because it isn't in POSIX. I couldn't find any references on this in the mailing list archives. Anyone?

See also:

UsePythonAsAnInteractiveShell (last edited 2009-11-19 08:27:58 by vpn-8061f54b)

Unable to edit the page? See the FrontPage for instructions.