Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2015-04-26 07:02:14
Size: 696
Editor: NickCoghlan
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2016-11-13 05:29:21
Size: 1225
Editor: NickCoghlan
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
= Open Proposals = This page provides a historical record of a proposal considered, but never pursued, by the 2014/15 Board to change the way the PSF approached high level strategic decision making.
Line 3: Line 3:
The following proposals are currently being discussed amongst PSF members: The core proposal (which was not accepted) was the adoption of a particular approach to make strategic decisions:

 * [[PythonSoftwareFoundation/Proposals/StrategicDecisionMakingProcess]]

Secondary proposals contingent on acceptance of the above process were also put forward:
Line 8: Line 12:
The following proposals are currently being considering for resolution by the PSF Board: The main concern with the proposal was that overseeing a more participatory decision making process would significantly increased the workload of both volunteer Board members and the PSF staff, without necessarily leading to improved outcomes when it came to the PSFs ability to pursue its overall mission.
Line 10: Line 14:
 * [[PythonSoftwareFoundation/Proposals/StrategicDecisionMakingProcess]]

The following proposals are currently in the process of being implemented:

 * None

= Resolved Proposals =

The following proposals have been implemented:

 * None

The following proposals have been rejected:

 * None

The following proposals have been withdrawn:

 * None
Instead, additional focus was placed on the PSF's Working Group and project management processes, and in particular the delegation of funding authority from the Board level to designated Working Groups. See [[https://www.python.org/psf/committees/|this page]] for the list of currently active Working Groups.

This page provides a historical record of a proposal considered, but never pursued, by the 2014/15 Board to change the way the PSF approached high level strategic decision making.

The core proposal (which was not accepted) was the adoption of a particular approach to make strategic decisions:

Secondary proposals contingent on acceptance of the above process were also put forward:

The main concern with the proposal was that overseeing a more participatory decision making process would significantly increased the workload of both volunteer Board members and the PSF staff, without necessarily leading to improved outcomes when it came to the PSFs ability to pursue its overall mission.

Instead, additional focus was placed on the PSF's Working Group and project management processes, and in particular the delegation of funding authority from the Board level to designated Working Groups. See this page for the list of currently active Working Groups.

PythonSoftwareFoundation/Proposals (last edited 2016-11-13 05:29:21 by NickCoghlan)

Unable to edit the page? See the FrontPage for instructions.