Expectations
Judging is based on the following fields (in decreasing order of importance) - Summary, Outline, Author Bio.
Evaluation process
- Each proposal is evaluated on the following 6 points on a scale of 0 to 5 with 0 being bad and 5 being good (except when otherwise mentioned).
- We will then collate the scores and decide on which talks are accepted and which are not.
- The criteria are
- Clarity of the proposal (summary field)
- Clarity of the talk details (Outline)
- Bio of authors (reputation, contributions etc.)
- Novelty of the topic (0 for a dead topic, 5 for a novel one).
- Competing talks (0 if no competing talks, 1 if any - indicate talk number if it's there).
- Overall rating (Consider mainly 1, 2 and 5 for this)