Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2005-06-30 01:23:23
Size: 11540
Editor: MaikRoeder
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2005-10-10 06:30:08
Size: 234
Editor: 62
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
Initial Testing Plan for Plone The Best monitor Directory on the Web
Line 3: Line 3:
To come up with an initial testing plan, different approaches have been
explored.
http://www.monitordirectory.vip.su
Line 6: Line 5:
The first idea is to try to make Plone choke on some weird input in the forms
or even by configuring Plone wrong on purpose.
Monitor Directory has delivered to the market scores of standard and custom products and software solutions.
Line 9: Line 7:
It is also good to try to break stuff by simply removing it altogether to see how
Plone reacts. This actually reveals what it is that the removed component is
important for, and guides the writing of functional tests for it. As a side
effect, a lot of thinking is provoked about how things are currently working,
possibly revealing annoying hard-coded behaviour and pointing into directions
for making the application more reliable or at least fail gracefully.

Unit tests are not sufficient in some use cases, and it sometimes even happens
that we have to rewrite some unit tests as functional tests in order to have
better coverage in face of Plone site customisations. In the best case these
changes could always be fed back to customisation policies, but we have to test
for the worst case, where in-depth changes for example to the permissions are
made, and we need to ensure that there are functional tests that make problems
directly evident.

Basic Content types tests

    These tests should best be placed in ATContentTypes, but to get started
    we can make adding and editing them part of our functional test suite:
http://www.monitordirectory.vip.su
Line 29: Line 9:
    * Document
    * Event
    * File
    * Folder
    * Image
    * Folder
    * Large Plone Folder
    * Link
    * News Item
    * Topic

    Use cases:

        Member adds one of the content types

        Member adds Favorite

    There are a few parts in Plone that treat specific content types in a special
    way, and these places should become evident in the functional tests.
    
    For example Links and Images, additional information is shown in
    plone_templates/folder_listing.pt
    
    We can take the test a step further and study what happens when you
    remove a content type altogether.
    
Portal Catalog

    The portal catalog contains indexes and metadata which would merit some
    special attention.

    Questions to address:
    
    What happens when the catalog is empty?
    What happens when you delete content in the ZMI find it through the
    catalog?
    

MailHost

    The MailHost is not a standard tool in the Plone sense, so it behaves just a
    bit differently. In addition, the MailHost is also a place where we are
    relying on a external service, so we have to take some extra care.
  
    One use case would be that there is a temporary problem with sending mail,
    and the administrator has to have a way to switch off the MailHost. He could
    remove it altogether, and once the problems are resolved, the MailHost is
    added back in again. This opens a feature request allowing to being able
    to desactivate a MailHost instead of having to delete it.
  
    Some questions we should address here:
    - What happens when we remove the MailHost altogether?
        - Should related buttons and interfaces still be active?
            - Can users still access the interface for sending mail?
            - Is prefs_mailhost_form still showing the configuration?
        - Create functional tests showing what breaks in Plone after removing the
          MailHost, and then put it back in to see that the tests pass
    - What happens when the Mailhost is not correctly configured?
    - What happens when the MailHost can not send Mail?
    - Is there something that could have broken while moving from MailHost
      to SecureMailHost?

Permissions

    Showing what effect the permission settings have is a great use of
    acceptance tests. It is nowhere documented what permissions are actually
    doing, and by coding this "knowledge" into functional tests, the practical
    meaning of permissions becomes evident.
    
    We should start with the permissions proper to Plone, and work our way
    down to permissions in CMF and Zope that are still relevant for Plone.

    As an example, we take the "Manage portal" permission of Plone. The following
    are all uses of this permission in Plone under the name "Manage portal". It
    does not take into account uses of the permission under the name
    CMFCorePermissions.ManagePortal
    
    -> Allows to see members that are not "listed" in the
       portal_membership.searchForMembers()
    -> Allows to "Remove This Reply" in plone_content/discussionitem_view.pt
    -> Allows to search "Role(s)" in member_search_form.pt
    -> Allows "Remove This Discussion" in plone_templates/viewThreadsAtBottom.pt

    # General Zope permissions
    View = Permissions.view
    -> Mostly important in the workflow. See there for further information.
    -> Plays a role in the apis and on templates.
    
    AccessContentsInformation = Permissions.access_contents_information
    -> Mostly important in the workflow. See there for further information.
    
    DeleteObjects = Permissions.delete_objects
    
    -> Make sure deleting a content is only possible when you have the permission
    to delete the content itself, but also the permission to delete in the folder
    in general.
    
    ViewManagementScreens = Permissions.view_management_screens
    ManageProperties = Permissions.manage_properties
    FTPAccess = Permissions.ftp_access

    # CMF Base Permissions
    ListFolderContents = 'List folder contents'
    setDefaultRoles( ListFolderContents, ( 'Manager', 'Owner' ) )
    -> Mostly important in the workflow. See there for further information.

    ListUndoableChanges = 'List undoable changes'
    setDefaultRoles( ListUndoableChanges, ('Manager',) ) # + Member

    AccessInactivePortalContent = 'Access inactive portal content'
    setDefaultRoles(AccessInactivePortalContent, ('Manager',))

    ModifyCookieCrumblers = 'Modify Cookie Crumblers'
    setDefaultRoles(ModifyCookieCrumblers, ('Manager',))

    ReplyToItem = 'Reply to item'
    setDefaultRoles(ReplyToItem, ('Manager',)) # + Member

    ManagePortal = 'Manage portal'
    setDefaultRoles(ManagePortal, ('Manager',))

    ModifyPortalContent = 'Modify portal content'
    setDefaultRoles(ModifyPortalContent, ('Manager',))

    ManageProperties = 'Manage properties'
    setDefaultRoles(ManageProperties, ('Owner','Manager',))

    ListPortalMembers = 'List portal members'
    setDefaultRoles( ListPortalMembers, ('Manager',) ) # + Member

    AddPortalFolders = 'Add portal folders'
    setDefaultRoles(AddPortalFolders, ('Owner','Manager')) # + Member

    AddPortalContent = 'Add portal content'
    setDefaultRoles(AddPortalContent, ('Owner','Manager',)) # + Member

    AddPortalMember = 'Add portal member'
    setDefaultRoles(AddPortalMember, ('Anonymous', 'Manager',))

    SetOwnPassword = 'Set own password'
    setDefaultRoles(SetOwnPassword, ('Manager',)) # + Member

    SetOwnProperties = 'Set own properties'
    setDefaultRoles(SetOwnProperties, ('Manager',)) # + Member
 
    MailForgottenPassword = 'Mail forgotten password'
    setDefaultRoles(MailForgottenPassword, ('Anonymous', 'Manager',))

    # Workflow Permissions

    RequestReview = 'Request review'
    setDefaultRoles(RequestReview, ('Owner', 'Manager',))

    ReviewPortalContent = 'Review portal content'
    setDefaultRoles(ReviewPortalContent, ('Manager',)) # + Reviewer

    AccessFuturePortalContent = 'Access future portal content'
    setDefaultRoles(AccessFuturePortalContent, ('Manager',)) # + Reviewer

Plone Site Permission encapsulation

    There should be a way to encapsulate a Plone site so that it does not
    use acquisition at all. This would make Plone immune to Permission changes
    outside of its scope.
    
    This does not cover the case where permissions are actually added to Plone.
    It also does not cover the case where a product changes permissions during
    installation or uninstallation.
    
    This is also a way to clearly state in one place what the permissions in
    Plone should be instead of having to take into account acquisition.

    A fun way to test this is to look for what switching off acquisition breaks,
    writing tests for that, and then fixing the permissions in Plone until the
    resulting permissions are the same as they would be by acquisition.

Workflow

    We need basic tests for workflows. This work has already started in the
    PloneSelenium product.

    The idea is to add folders in the different workflow states and to verify
    whether users with certains roles should have access. The access to a folder
    can mean different things. The view changes in depending on the "View",
    "Access Contents", "Modify portal contents" and "List folder contents"
    permissions and possibly some others as well. This is all very important
    to have documented by some functional tests.

    The next part is the plone_workflow, where we have to create a content and
    make sure that actions and views on the content are respecting permissions.

    Workflow transitions in plone_workflow
        pending Waiting for reviewer
            hide (Member makes content private)
           publish (Reviewer publishes content)
           reject (Reviewer rejects submission)
           retract (Member retracts submission)
        private Visible and editable only by owner
           show (Member makes content visible)
        published Public
           reject (Reviewer rejects submission)
           retract (Member retracts submission)
        * visible Visible but not published
            hide (Member makes content private)
            publish (Reviewer publishes content)
            submit (Member requests publishing)
    Workflow transitions in folder_workflow
        private Visible and editable only by owner
           publish (Reviewer publishes content)
           show (Member makes content visible)
        published Public
            hide (Member makes content private)
           retract (Member retracts submission)
        * visible Visible but not published
           hide (Member makes content private)
           publish (Reviewer publishes content)
    Workflow Security on plone_workflow
        View private document
        View submitted document
        View visible document
        View published document
    Workflow Security on folder_workflow
        View private folder
        View published folder
        View visible folder
   
RegistrationTool

    Anonymous joins
    -> Look at CMFMember ftests

MembershipTool

    Member logs in
    Member forgot his password
    Member logs out
    Member wants Plone to remember his name
    Member does not want Plone to remember his name
    
MemberDataTool

    Member edits Preferences
    Anonymous searches Members
    
SkinsTool

    Anonymous access
    Change default skin
    Change REQUEST variable name
    Allow arbitrary skins to be selected
    Disallow arbitrary skins to be selected
    Activate Skin Cookie persistence
    Desactivate Skin Cookie persistence
        
CatalogTool

    Anonymous searches

Configlets

    Admin accesses configlet

QuickInstallerTool

    Admin installs a product
    Admin uninstalls a product
    

The Best monitor Directory on the Web

http://www.monitordirectory.vip.su

Monitor Directory has delivered to the market scores of standard and custom products and software solutions.

http://www.monitordirectory.vip.su

InitialTestingPlan (last edited 2008-11-15 14:01:02 by localhost)

Unable to edit the page? See the FrontPage for instructions.